Net income can be shaped by accounting choices. Cash is harder to dress up. That's why patient investors watch free cash flow, the cash a business generates after paying to keep and grow its operations. This is Part 8 of our Read the Numbers series, and it builds directly on the cash flow statement.

The basic definition

The most common version is operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. Operating cash flow comes from the first section of the cash flow statement, and capital expenditures are the purchases of property and equipment in the investing section.

Free cash flow for the hypothetical company in the series
Cash from operating activities$111,000
Less: purchase of equipment (capital expenditures)($60,000)
Free cash flow$51,000
Free cash flow ÷ net income: $51,000 ÷ $96,00053.1%
Same hypothetical company as Parts 1 through 3.

The company earned $96,000 but, after reinvesting $60,000 in equipment, had $51,000 of free cash. Neither number is wrong; they answer different questions.

An important caution from the SEC

Free cash flow isn't a formal accounting measure, so definitions vary. In its staff guidance on non-GAAP measures, the SEC says the term has no uniform definition and its title doesn't describe how it's calculated, so a company presenting it should provide a clear description of the calculation and the reconciliation. The staff also says it shouldn't be used in a way that implies it's residual cash available for discretionary spending, since many companies have mandatory debt payments or other non-discretionary expenditures that aren't deducted. And it's a liquidity measure that must not be presented on a per-share basis.

In plain terms: before relying on any free cash flow number, find out how that company or data provider calculated it. Two sources can report different figures for the same company.

The warning sign: profit up, free cash flow down

Table: a hypothetical company's three-year trend
YearNet incomeOperating cash flowCapital expendituresFree cash flow
Year 1$80,000$95,000$25,000$70,000
Year 2$90,000$80,000$40,000$40,000
Year 3$100,000$60,000$50,000$10,000

Net income rose 25% over the period while free cash flow fell by about 86%. Reported profit looks like a success story; the cash tells a different one. The usual cause is the pattern we walked through in Part 2: customers paying slower, inventory building up, or heavy spending to maintain growth. Any one year can be noise, but a multi-year divergence deserves an explanation in the 10-K's management discussion.

Where free cash flow can mislead

Using it well

A sensible approach is to look at free cash flow over several years and compare it with net income. A healthy business tends to turn profit into cash fairly consistently. When the two diverge for years, the question becomes why, and the answer is usually in the notes and the management discussion.

Common questions

What is free cash flow?

Free cash flow is commonly defined as cash from operating activities minus capital expenditures. It's the cash left after paying to maintain and expand the business. Because it isn't a formal accounting measure, the exact formula varies between companies and data providers.

Is free cash flow better than net income?

They answer different questions. Net income reflects accounting profit, including non-cash items and sales not yet collected. Free cash flow reflects cash actually generated after investment. Looking at both, and the gap between them over time, is more informative than either alone.

Why can free cash flow be negative for a healthy company?

A company investing heavily in growth, such as building factories or stocking inventory ahead of expansion, can have negative free cash flow even while profitable. What matters is whether the spending is producing returns and how the company is funding it.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. The company and figures in the examples are hypothetical and exist only to illustrate the concepts. Financial ratios vary meaningfully by industry and should not be used in isolation to evaluate a company; consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.